Re: The Devil On JOA!?

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:43 -0400, kstahl <ktsahl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


>Why don't you discuss the real issues that I brought up in the first 
>place rather then just knocking the presentation? I am fairly certain it 
>is because you realized very quickly that you can't even begin to handle 
>the subject based on your own studies or else you would have attacked 
>the message rather then the messenger. And you wouldn't have needed to 
>use profanity and vulgarity along the way. Something I still haven't had 
>to resort to.
>
>Or do you just prefer name-calling because you don't possess sufficient 
>intellectual capability to deal with the issue itself? I'm guessing that 
>your lambast answer will be sufficient to let everyone else know your 
>choice since you really don't have a choice at all. You can only go with 
>what you know - apparently.

You're just another class-a hypocrite.  Why should anyone bother with you
other then to hurl back the same narrow minded "presentation" as you call
it
that you spew?  Tell me how your choice of words like "narrow minded
individuals" or "act like a man and admit it" is a search for intellectual
honesty and not simply a personal attack?  Oh, yeah, I know, because you
think you're righteous.

Like I said, you really need to look in the mirror.  Without the blinders
this time.  You're just another hater.  Part of the problem not part of
any
solution.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"There would be a lot more civility in this world if people
 didn't take that as an invitation to walk all over you"
                   - (Calvin and Hobbes)