ottomatic wrote:
> "David" <dimlan17@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1116826464.648680.195940@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ottomatic wrote:
> > > "David" <dimlan17@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > news:6h2s81h8hdrtpbkk57thcs9uvfar9sohbs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:50:54 GMT, "ottomatic"
<spamout@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >"Taylor" <taylor.taylor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > >news:f%jje.4343$Wp.711821@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ubiquitous wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > CBS head Leslie Moonves declared this week: "I think
talking
> > to
> > > ghosts
> > > > >> > will skew younger than talking to God."
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Moonves made the starling comments during a breakfast with
> > re****ters
> > > > >> > where he announced his new fall schedule.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > "The Ghost Whisperer," a supernatural drama about a woman
who
> > > > >> > communicates with the spirit world, will replace "Joan of
> > Arcadia,"
> > > > >which
> > > > >> > features a young woman who speaks to God.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > "They called us the geezer network," Moonves explained.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> As bad as 'Joan Of Arcadia' was this year (or so I hear
since
> > I've
> > > never
> > > > >> seen the show), hiring Jennifer Love Hewitt isn't the way to
go.
> > W/ the
> > > > >> one-two punch,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>they got Scientoligy kook Jenna Elfman, too. Yick!
> > > > >
> > > > >were you not aware that
> > > > >a distressingly high number of people in the "entertainment
> > industry"
> > > > >have been caught by Scientology?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > What's so distressing about it?
> > >
> > > it is a cult, a money scamming cult
> >
> > So are you afraid that you're weak-minded and will be brainwashed
by
> > your favorite celebrity?
> >
> > > > Their religion is their business.
> > >
> > > doesn't change the above
> >
> > And still none of your business
>
> well, Mr. missed-the-point by a mile
>
> A. the OP was decrying the selection of a Scientology member <Geena
Elf>
> to be on a new show
>
> B. I pointed out, what I thought was extremely well known, common
knowledge,
> that many very successful entertainers are members
>
> C. it is a topic of discussion on this newsgroup, makes it ok for me
to
> comment
>
> so what combination of inability to read for content and lack of
ability
> to think in a logical manner would lead you to conclude I breached
> some rule of etiquette
You used the word "distressing." I asked why you'd find it distressing
much less why it's any of your business what religion say, Jenna Elfman
for example, chooses. You haven't answered.
> methinks perhaps you are just some random Scientology fool
> who is ****lling for the cult
Yes, yes I am. Here, have some pamphlets.
|
