Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > JunkYard Wars > Re: Dead group,...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 7 Topic 57 of 122
Post > Topic >>

Re: Dead group, huh?

by jac@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Clear) Apr 22, 2004 at 09:09 AM

In article <2db737c90be9f2366ffb8e98848c3984@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Oppie <boppie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>-----------------
> Same here. I always was more interested in the build and seeing how well
>the design choices actually worked against each other. Some of the group
>dynamics just have gotten as silly and contrived as pro wrestling.

<aol> Me Too!</aol>

A good build with good teamwork is great to watch.  The Mulewrights
hill climber was one of the best in this area.  Lots of teamwork
needed to get everything assembled, but the team worked great
together and was a joy to watch.

The 'pick a random bunch of idiots' teams of the past two seasons
were awful to watch.  Hopefully we get to see this seasons Scrapheap
that was mentioned in another post.

John
-- 
John Clear - jac@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  			http://www.panix.com/~jac




 7 Posts in Topic:
Dead group, huh?
steamer <steamer@[EMAI  2004-04-13 16:03:53 
Re: Dead group, huh?
TomK <namffuak@[EMAIL   2004-04-13 20:58:01 
Re: Dead group, huh?
"Lakeuk" <no  2004-04-17 20:27:26 
Re: Dead group, huh?
TomK <namffuak@[EMAIL   2004-04-17 16:55:30 
Re: Dead group, huh?
"Oppie" <bop  2004-04-22 13:06:41 
Re: Dead group, huh?
jac@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (J  2004-04-22 09:09:59 
Re: Dead group, huh?
Bruce Simpson <checksi  2004-04-23 10:11:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 8:57:23 CDT 2008.