> Maybe because no one listens to this first poster. Just someone
> trolling and using Bush's known weaknesses. Still, this poster did
> miss out the WMDs and how their own President lied to the US citizens.
>
Can't forget them? Couldn't be done for other reasons? It's done, finish
up, let them decide which way they want to go.
> >> What were you thinking???
> >
> >If we cared what the rest of the world thinks, we'd probably have you
> >protecting us,
>
> I doubt that anyone can protect you. People will judge you based on
> your own actions.
>
Depends on your definition of 'is' is. We cannot respond because there
are
some that want to tie our hands behind our backs. Look at France and the
Ivory Coast, they must be fighting(defending themselves) for nothing. I
know 'give peace a chance', for how long, till the streets are populated
by
you enemy?
> >but since you're not, we have to do it ourselves. I think
> >we'll do a better job of it too, we already are.
>
> Then why has the number of bombings around the World increased?
>
Where there's a will, there is a way. If you want to do something bad
enough, you wait until nobody is looking your direction.
> In my view Afghanistan was fair enough, but in Iraq this is like the
> US stirring up more trouble for themselves.
>
> When 9/11 #2 comes around, then you will see how current US policy is
> protecting you. Violence only begets more violence.
>
Like I said before, some want to tie our hands behind our backs and we
just
sit there and get attacked. It gets old and the instigators continue to
murder the innocent.
> >Go ahead, turn your back, that just gives your enemies a better target,
you
> >won't even know it's coming. Who has their head in the sand now?
>
> Cough, US, cough.
>
> Nice ideas. Just a problem in the implementation.
>
It's not perfect.
> Cardman
> http://www.cardman.com
> http://www.cardman.co.uk
|
