Re: New KITT mockup

In article <0nu7g2tkjkvqies8uo382pfo7p3p9pc4n2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ed Chilada
<nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 07:43:07 -0400, "Wombat-Pipex-News"
> <wombat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > 
> >Just dont think that a vampet up plastic molded peace of ****e modern
car 
> >will do the trick. The Trans-am styling was almost Perfect.
> 
> For 30+ years ago!

It's still a great looking car. Most of the "supercars" are far too
wide and many of today's more normal s****ts cars are simply ugly.



> >To be honest I think that KITT and the nose is 110% a better design
> >than any of the Original Trans-ams styling produced in stock.
> >Most of the modern cars made today are based on the same floor pan
> >designes anyhow, and All are pants.
> 
> Yeah, the Koenigsegg's probably based on a Ford Focus!

Nope. It's one of the few companies that aren't owned in an ever
spinning circle of "normal" car comapnies.



> > Dukes of Hazard car is what makes Dukes of Hazard and
> > the movie. Same goes for Starskey and Hutch.
> 
> Neither of which were supposed to have *futuristic* cars.

There's your mistake. KITT was never meant to be a "futuristic car" -
it was meant to be a normal looking car with "futuristic" abilities.
That's why they used a TransAm in the first place and not some silly
looking prototype / custom car.