On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:32:47 -0400, "Jason Sobol"
<musicmanason@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>Whether it's great looking is irrelevant. It's *dated* and it's not
>>even been in production for .. how many years?
>
>the car has only been out of production FOUR years, the design used in KR
>ended in 1984 (85-90 and 91-92s were a different design on the same
>body...just updated) and the 3rd gens have been gone 14.
Yeah, I realise this, I looked it up. Perhaps I should have been more
specific about what I mean WRT the model being out of production. I'm
talking about the KITT model of course, not the name.
>Im not about to sit here and argue about your "dated" comments. 3rd Gens
>still are decent looking cars, albeit not as sleek as the 4th Gen, but
still
>good for the car that it is.
That I wouldn't argue with. It's just still a design that people
associate with last century. If that design of Trans Am hadn't existed
before and then it got launched tomorrow and they subsequently based
KITT on it, then it'd make sense. It'd be a current car design.
>Feel free to share your opinion with us, but dont start to flame people
who
>dont necessarily agree with you.
Huh?
|
