On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:06:39 -0400, "80 Knight"
<80_knightREMOVEMEPLEASE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Actually, if you take a good look at KITT, and then at a stock 1982 Trans
>Am, they are virtually identical on the outside. KITT has a different
front
>bumper, a front scanning light, and a black-out piece on the tail lights.
>Other then that, KITT is identical to a stock 1982 Trans Am. As for the
>inside, that's totally different. My only point with the '69 Charger
being
>used, is that the fans *expected* to see it, and were happy as pig's in
****
>to have it on the big screen. I feel the same way about the '82 Trans Am.
>After thinking about it, I *could* see KITT being a brand new Trans Am,
but
>it would still feel different. Same as it felt when he was a Dodge in
>"KR:2000". The voice was the same, but it just wasn't KITT.
If they had a plot where KITT was planted in a modern car, but it just
seemed to not work out and various things failed and missions were
going wrong etc.. and then they decided to go back to the original
design - within the context of the film, then that would make sense.
It would probably make the crowd whoop with a "yay! old KITT was the
best", etc...
|
