On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:41:29 +1200, Anybody
<anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>In article <jaydnQvVm9Lj3pDYnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "80 Knight"
><80_knightREMOVEMEPLEASE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> Again, I don't see how you would get confusion. For starters, if they
>> started talking about KITT being 2006 Camero (or whatever he will be),
that
>> would limit it down right there. All you have to do is glance at the
post,
>> and if you are interested in the show to be reading it's group, you
should
>> be able to tell which show/movie is being talked about.
>
>Just one simple example:
>
>In ten years time (after they've made a different version) you look in
>your TV listings and see that "Knight Rider" is being re-run ... which
>Knight Rider is it??
>
>On the other hand, if they actually used a different name, even
>marginally different, then you look in your TV listing and see "Knight
>Rider 2007" is what they re-running.
>
>The first cause confusion and disappointment when someone wanting one
>version tunes in to find it's the other version. The second option
>causes absolutely no confusion at all and those wanting to watch that
>particular version can tune in while those not wanting to don't bother.
Huh? Is this a good reason for dictating the direction of the film,
because in 10 years time, some retard reading the TV guide can't
figure out whether that 45 minute "Knight Rider" programme is the
movie or not?
|
