"Anybody" <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:051120061638426793%anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <t17qk2lahq7iuerhcejg7mrh3o6k8n8od7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ed Chilada
> <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:55:21 +1300, Anybody
>> <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <Xns987125374963Eivanotter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ivan Otter
>> >Rudakov <ivanotter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
<Snip>
>> Please explain exactly what should be made, for you to consider it a
>> Knight Rider film, including the character, actors, cars, settings and
>> potential plot. Essentially, outline the film that *you* think should
>> be made. Please don't bail by saying that one shouldn't be made.
>
> That's precisely what I personally do want: NO so-called "Knight Rider"
> movie and no more idiotic "remakes" / "updates.
>
> No matter what they do they can not possibly re-capture the essence
> that made "Knight Rider" (or whatever) what it was. They simply create
> some modernised nonsense that doesn't fit and then they wonder why most
> of the time it bombs badly. It's totally illogical to pee all over the
> existing fan base. If that fan base can't support a movie version, then
> don't make it, make something else instead.
And there you have it, folks! "Anybody" has spoken. From now on, no
"Knight
Rider" movie will be made, nor will any other movie be made, without his
express written permission.
"Anybody", you are one serious selfish moron. Just because you might not
like the new KR movie, it shouldn't be made? Yeah, right. I'm so glad to
see
that you think you have the right to speak for the entire KR fanbase.
|
