In article <UMudnfcgnqtQGdDYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "80 Knight"
<80_knightSPMASUCKS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Remove SPMASUCKS To Reply> wrote:
> "Anybody" <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:051120061638426793%anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <t17qk2lahq7iuerhcejg7mrh3o6k8n8od7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ed Chilada
> > <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:55:21 +1300, Anybody
> >> <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <Xns987125374963Eivanotter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ivan Otter
> >> >Rudakov <ivanotter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
> >> Please explain exactly what should be made, for you to consider it a
> >> Knight Rider film, including the character, actors, cars, settings
and
> >> potential plot. Essentially, outline the film that *you* think should
> >> be made. Please don't bail by saying that one shouldn't be made.
> >
> > That's precisely what I personally do want: NO so-called "Knight
Rider"
> > movie and no more idiotic "remakes" / "updates.
> >
> > No matter what they do they can not possibly re-capture the essence
> > that made "Knight Rider" (or whatever) what it was. They simply create
> > some modernised nonsense that doesn't fit and then they wonder why
most
> > of the time it bombs badly. It's totally illogical to pee all over the
> > existing fan base. If that fan base can't support a movie version,
then
> > don't make it, make something else instead.
>
> And there you have it, folks! "Anybody" has spoken. From now on, no
"Knight
> Rider" movie will be made, nor will any other movie be made, without his
> express written permission.
> "Anybody", you are one serious selfish moron. Just because you might not
> like the new KR movie, it shouldn't be made? Yeah, right. I'm so glad to
see
> that you think you have the right to speak for the entire KR fanbase.
I knew you would be moronic enough to post an answer like that. :-\
I was asked what I would prefer!!! That is what I would prefer ... it's
also what any real fan of any show woudl prefer - something that
actually resmebles the show they liked rather than some butechered
hodge-podge of modernised silliness hiding behind the same name. Why
would any real fan want to watch something that claims to be "Knight
Rider" and yet is different in almost every possible way??
Yet again, you prove yourself to not be able to read or understand
common sense ... and you crawl back to the ridiculous "it's good"
answer that is completely irrelevant. Yet again you can't even give any
real reason why a NEW VERSION with lots of silly changes that make it
barely recognisable is re-using the same name.
Yet another idiot with no brains meets the killfile.
|
