In article <4ktuk2hcqg80hhp4lmcg3395dgs4hvsebh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ed Chilada
<nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 09:24:59 +1300, Anybody
> <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >I was asked what I would prefer!!! That is what I would prefer ... it's
> >also what any real fan of any show woudl prefer - something that
> >actually resmebles the show they liked
>
> Nope, you actually said you'd prefer for the film not to be made, now
> you're saying that any real fan would just require it to resemble the
> show they liked. Now then, please explain how the film won't resemble
> the show *after* you've discarded all the assumptions that *you* have
> made about it.
>
> And as I've asked before, please actually state the characters,
> actors, settings, technologies, cars, etc.. that you'd expect to be in
> this film for it to still "resemble the show they liked".
I've already told you what I prefer. If you don't know what "Knight
Rider" is by now, then it's far too late for me to try and explain it
to you and you're in the wrong newsgroup. :-\
> > Why would any real fan want to watch something that claims to be#
> > "Knight Rider" and yet is different in almost every possible way??
>
> Who said it would be "different in almost every possible way"?
Have you seen ANY of Hollyweird's "remake" / "updates" ... NONE of them
are like the original. Even ignoring the parody ones, they *DO* make
lots of ridiculous changes that *DOES* create a new version.
As I've said, you can NOT recapture the magic that made Knight Rider
what it was - it's a product of the people and time that it was made.
All they do is end up making a new version, and therfore they may as
well give it a new name. From every angle it make more sense, while it
makes absolutely zero sense to re-use the same name for a different
product. Any movie they make now WILL have silly changes, it WILL be
modernised, and therefore will NOT be "Knight Rider". Hollyweir'd track
record guarantees that 100%.
If it's not worth making an actual movie of the show it was (even if
they could recapture it), then why bother trying - why not simply make
their NEW movie with their NEW ideas under a NEW name?? It's pure
common sense. At the very least, people who disliked the original
"Knight Rider" will be more likely to give a movie a look-see if it's
called something else since they won't have the preconceived ideas from
the original.
> >Yet another idiot with no brains meets the killfile.
>
> As "80 Knight", said. It's a bit poor if your reaction to someone
> disagreeing with you is to killfile them. Have some balls and put up
> an argument man.
If I'd wanted to killfile the twitr for not agreeing with me, then he
would have gone in there years ago. He's now there because I *REALLY*
can't be bothered dealing with idiots who simply can't read or try to
'mind-read' what I'm "really" trying to say - I've said what I meant to
say, there is nothing "between the lines" or any "hidden meaning".
And since it looks like you can't read either, I guess your inane reply
to this will mean you get added to the killfile as well.
|
