In article <47348289$0$32554$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Milt
<netrage@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 80 Knight wrote:
> > "Milt" <netrage@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:47347429$0$19783$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> 80 Knight wrote:
> >>> This is from: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34497
> >>
> >> Sounds like it has interesting possibilities but I'll wait to see
what it
> >> looks like before I can rally comment much more.
> >
> > One thing I find most interesting is it seems Glen Larson who created
the
> > original, is more interested in doing a remake, where as Universal
wants to
> > do a sequel. Anyhow, I totally agree with you Milt. As good or bad
as
> > ideas sound, nothing is set-in-stone until we see it on the small or
big
> > screen, and I don't think it's fair to judge it until that happens.
>
> That doesn't surprise me about Glen Larson really. Wasn't he behind the
> complete re-do of the show now known as Battlestar Galactica but has
> ZERO in common with the original series by the same name? Sounds like he
> wants to do the same thing with Knight Rider, if so, I can't say I'm
> interested.
>
> What next? Buck Rodgers?
No, Glen Larson has little (if anything) to do with the new show. Yes,
I believe his name appears on the credits, but that is most likely due
to him creating the original that Ron Moore has butchered for HIS
version.
And just like the new so-called "Battlestar Galactica", the new
so-called "Knight Rider" WILL be awful garbage with little resemblance
to the original. Yet another stupid in-name-only "remake" / "update"
show from Hollyweird! If they must make such rubbish, at least have the
intelligence and decency of NOT reusing the old name - they should give
their NEW show a NEW name. :-(
|
