"Anybody" <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:040420080921202021%anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <47f4b64d$0$16649$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Milt
> <netrage@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> 80 Knight wrote:
>> >
>> > What reviews are you reading? Most of the reviews I have seen were
>> > positive.
>>
>> The ones in his head, remember, this IS the same person that has been
so
>> negative about this project since it was first announced. They hope it
>> is short-lived, just to say "I told you so!".
>
> There are lots of reviews (both professional critics and "normal"
> viewers) basically said the acting in the movie was bad, the script was
> bad and the idea was old hat, etc. Most ending with phrases along the
> lines of "give it a miss unless you're feeling nostaligic".
>
> Personally I haven't seen the movie, but some of the stuff I read
> before made it sound like it would be quite good and be one of the VERY
> VERY VERY few of Hollyweird's silly "remakes" / "update" movies that
> might actually be worth watching for a change.
The movie was not Oscar material, but IMHO, it was worth the 2 hours I
spent
watching it. I have it on tape, and I will likely watch it again at some
point, especially if they bring out a series.
|
