<email@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bfcf262d863723e98971a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <W6Bkd.62233$Tq1.37355@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> frosty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> > As distasteful as it is, I agree. The problem is, the other choice
would
be
> > to vote for someone that sup****ts killing approximately 1,370,000
innocent
> > babies EVERY YEAR. Most of us chose the lesser of two evils.
> >
>
> strange comment I dont understand...
>
> but the best option is to make a point of not voting when none of the
> candidates are acceptable
1,370,000 babies are aborted (killed before birth) each year in the US.
Over
133,000 of them are after the baby would likely live if born that early.
By the way, I favor women's choice. She should CHOOSE to keep her legs
closed or use contraception, not kill a victim of a STUPID CHOICE.
|
