"bf" <bfordyce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1152896677.251345.313580@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> El Puerco wrote:
>> "bf" <bfordyce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:1152798083.054380.310010@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > I could see the parallel to reality if Clark was a "Bad boy", but
>> > there's no way Smallville Clark would be attractive to any girl.
>>
>> The following is almost the definition of a "bad boy:"
>>
>> > The
>> > moping, self pity, wimpy, lying act would get old very quick with
>> > women.
>>
>> Surprisingly enough, it doesn't. I've been doing all that for decades
>> and
>> have yet to be dumped (yelled at, yes).
>
> Dude, I know some girls will put up with lying and the emotional abuse,
> but I think what would scare women away is Clark's constant need for
> consoling. Clark is emotionally about 5 years old. Always depressed
> and whiney. Not to mention that Clark has no interest whatsoever in ***
> or even kissing. That is definitely not a "bad boy" trait LOL.
What men think is a "bad boy" and what a woman thinks is a "bad boy" are
two
different things. Men think it's a ***ually aggressive asshole jerk but
women aren't typically attracted to that "bad boy" to nearly the degree
they
are attracted to the James Dean-ish "bad boy" (you're tearing me apart!).
Ya know, the dude who's emotionally about 5 years old. :-)
|
