"bf" <bfordyce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1153762521.824065.218420@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Anim8rFSK wrote:
>
>> Which I never for a moment believed. Not once during that whole RedK
>> summer in Metropolis? I think this is like flying: Clark is a virgin,
>> but Kal is not.
>>
>> And Lana? Lana's a virgin? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAA.
>
> Yes, the fact that the writers feel compelled to constantly remind us
> that Lana and Clark have only had *** with each other is absurd.
>
> Lana was willing to do it with Jason, but he declined.
> Lana has physically spent the night with Lex, but they were always
> fully clothed.
> What about that huge orgy party when Isabelle cast the spell. Everyone
> was running around ****d (implied by the women's underwear left at the
> barn, and Clark dancing around in boxers).
> Yet, neither Isabelle (Lana's body) or Clark had *** that night?
> Hypno Chick was another absurd example, although the fact that Clark
> didn't have *** with his WIFE Alicea is the most absurd example of all.
>
We did see the reason for that--the Red K necklace. But it doesn't
explain
the next episode where they were together again. Where Clark was willing
to
risk popular scorn for dating her but as soon as some mystery pops up he
suspects her of attempted murder.
BC
|
