Re: What up with that ghostbuster device?

tdciago wrote:
> On Feb 7, 10:54�pm, s0183616 <s0183...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Is that the official spelling of the name? �Was it in the credits?
> 
> I don't think they show that in the credits, but it's the official
> spelling.  There have been press releases, etc.
> http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Miles
> 
>> If so, this is indeed another intentional anagram, I believe.
> 
> Not an anagram, but an intentional homonym.

Aah, you are correct.  I was assuming anagram without actually looking 
to see if that worked.

Well, it's probably still intentional.  Not so positive now, though.