On Mar 4, 3:21 pm, d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Drew Lawson) wrote:
> In article
<0bea71ef-249c-485d-8bab-5365699ed...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "broug...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <broug...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> >On Mar 4, 11:42 am, d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Drew Lawson) wrote:
> >> In article
<6ca8becd-43c7-454e-85bc-6e0f39bc2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> "broug...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <broug...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> >> [pet peeve: You don't win things at auction. You buy them. But
> >> that is probably permanently corrupted by eBay.]
>
> >ah but don't you have the winning bid or is that an ebay thing too?
>
> My auction attendance is several years faded in my memory, but I
> believe you have the "high bid." I could be wrong. Several valid
> and standard phrasings get under my skin as well.
>
> >> >my question is why did widmore want the journal in the first place.
>
> >> There was rampant spectulation a while back (started by The Lost
> >> Experience, I think) that Widmore Industries and the Hanso Foundation
> >> were deeply involved with each other. This may be a tease to renew
> >> that interest or it may be another crumb on that trail.
>
> >involved in a good or bad way?
>
> Bwa hah ha HA!
>
> Um, well, I don't really know. But involved in secretive ways.
well that goes without saying.
Penni
|
