Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Tv Lost > Re: A Jin Theor...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 20 Topic 15781 of 17450
Post > Topic >>

Re: A Jin Theory

by "tim@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <tbil99@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 14, 2008 at 12:06 PM

On Mar 14, 6:54 am, "Rach" <rnashjrbott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> And think about what Hurley actually said.
> "Shouldn't we go see him?"
> Not "Let's go see him."
>
> "Shouldn't" could be the clue here. If they are putting on a show, they
> "should" go to the grave, whether it's real or not. Sun could cry for a
> number of reasons, perhaps because he husband, her baby's father, is
back on
> the island. Sun's conversation with "dead Jin" could very much have been
> part of the act.
>
> We know for a fact that Jin DIDN'T die in the crash so the tombstone is
a
> lie either way.
>
> I think I need to watch this again.
>
> "s0183616" <s0183...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:rWnCj.1032$qT6.771@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Todd wrote:
> >> I think it's possible that Jin is alive and still on the island. 
Jack
> >> has been telling a lie about what really happened, so it's possible
> >> Jin's death has been re****ted to help cover up the existence of the
> >> island. As for Sun's and Hurley's sadness at the cemetery, perhaps
they
> >> too
> >> are playing a role because they are being watched by Widmore's or
> >> Paik's people.  Something just doesn't ring true about this.  It
smells
> >> of a red
> >> herring.  Even the preview for next week's episode, where we're told
> >> someone is going to die, doesn't convince me.  Lost isn't known for
> >> giving things away that easily.  Of course, I could be completely off
> >> base.  Guess we'll find out soon
> >> enough.
>
> > No, it makes very good sense.  I will bet you and I are correct.

"I guess we should, like, go see him".
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
A Jin Theory
Todd <twrexxnospam@[EM  2008-03-13 22:18:38 
Re: A Jin Theory
s0183616 <s0183616@[EM  2008-03-14 01:20:16 
Re: A Jin Theory
"Steven L." <  2008-03-14 01:42:13 
Re: A Jin Theory
"Rach" <rnas  2008-03-14 07:55:52 
Re: A Jin Theory
JT <noaddressgiven@[EM  2008-03-14 10:49:42 
Re: A Jin Theory
s0183616 <s0183616@[EM  2008-03-14 14:55:42 
Re: A Jin Theory
Kittyn <wooly@[EMAIL P  2008-03-14 13:54:24 
Re: A Jin Theory
"Rach" <rnas  2008-03-14 07:54:51 
Re: A Jin Theory
Todd <twrexxnospam@[EM  2008-03-14 18:52:44 
Re: A Jin Theory
David B <bothecat3@[EM  2008-03-15 03:58:58 
Re: A Jin Theory
"tim@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-03-14 12:06:35 
Re: A Jin Theory
"tim@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-03-14 12:08:54 
Re: A Jin Theory
Jim Gysin <jimgysin@[E  2008-03-14 20:15:30 
Re: A Jin Theory
"Steven L." <  2008-03-14 01:33:30 
Re: A Jin Theory
Todd <twrexxnospam@[EM  2008-03-14 18:54:13 
Re: A Jin Theory
Lord Wayne <whome@[EMA  2008-03-14 07:54:57 
Re: A Jin Theory
mpc <unknownart@[EMAIL  2008-03-14 01:00:33 
Re: A Jin Theory
"Phyllis Chamberlai  2008-03-14 13:43:31 
Re: A Jin Theory
Todd <twrexxnospam@[EM  2008-03-14 18:54:45 
Re: A Jin Theory
mpc <unknownart@[EMAIL  2008-03-15 05:18:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 18:43:11 CST 2008.