Jimbo wrote:
> It seems like sooo many people look to the podcasts for some answers.
> What about the people who don't get the podcasts?
> I do know a few people who watch LOST but don't get podcasts, as a mater
of
> fact, one of them doesn't even use a computer or cell phone.
>
> My question is this . . .
> Do you think that someone who only watches LOST as a weekly show would
be
> able to keep up with it and not loose interest in it?
> I know that some of the people I know that only watch the TV show are
> starting to watch other shows now and are forgetting to watch LOST.
>
> Do you think that the producers are trying to capitalize on the idea of
a
> show that requires so much investment that the viewer will watch it
because
> of the time and energy invested?
>
> In Economics this way of thinking is called a "sunk cost" and to dwell
on it
> is a bad thing.
>
> If this is the case then "The Economist" may have a deeper meaning.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I like the show and have watched every one, even
read NG
> posts but, I just thought of this and was wondering if anyone else
thought
> this.
>
>
I don't do anything but watch the show and read this newsgroup. I'm
enjoying and understanding the show thorougly.
|
