Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Tv Lost > Re: "Lost" on n...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 41 Topic 15912 of 17423
Post > Topic >>

Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)

by "Dano" <janeanddano@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 21, 2008 at 11:26 AM

Grüe wrote:
> "copeab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <copeab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:472f3183-ada5-48cf-
> 804c-2031f0505361@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> The main question, if this is the case, is: How did the team find
>> them? It was clearly an ambush, so the team knew they eere coming,
>> but how? Miles?
>>
>> Brandon
>
> My guess would be that Lapidus was told to make a landing far away
> from the known encampments, namely Otherville and the beach, so the
> team could make a surprise approach by land. During a passby to get
> the lay of the land, the location of The Temple may have been
> discovered, or the Others traveling there may have been spotted or
> tracked. Ideally, there is to be nobody on the island left to tell
> the tale, so Richard and all the Others would have to be killed, as
> well. Especially Cindy and the children, if the freighter crew are
> even aware of their status at all.

I don't buy it.  Why would they target these three?  Actually, I should
say 
two...I don't think they had any intention of hitting Alex.  I think it
was 
Ben's people.  Ben hated Rousseau and Karl, and wanted them out of Alex's 
life.  Why couldn't the shooters have been the Others?

The shooter (or shooters) seemed to be very accurate.  They used silencers

apparently (though I thought that made for less accurate shots).  Why
would 
they do that anyway?  If I recall the skeet shooting scene, they were
making 
an awful lot of racket...and were not all that accurate either...using 
automatic weapons.  I most of all can't see these three being a first
target 
of a strike force to wipe out the inhabitants.  I'm not even sure at all 
that is the purpose of those from the freighter.  If they expected 
hostility, wouldn't any prudent course be to come armed and prepared to 
engage resistance.  I don't see the leap to thinking they were there to 
simply murder innocents.  The only ones who planted that notion are Ben
and 
Tom.  I find it amusing that so many will still take their word at face 
value.
 




 41 Posts in Topic:
"Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Garondo Marondo <Class  2008-03-20 19:28:56 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
masonReloaded <jonmaso  2008-03-20 19:35:04 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
tdciago <tdciago@[EMAI  2008-03-20 19:40:23 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"copeab@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-20 19:42:15 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
s0183616 <s0183616@[EM  2008-03-21 02:49:41 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Grüe" <a@[E  2008-03-21 02:59:38 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
s0183616 <s0183616@[EM  2008-03-21 03:03:57 
Re: "Lost" On No!!1! (Spoiler)
Fred Ellis <fkellis@[E  2008-03-20 22:24:17 
Re: "Lost" On No!!1! (Spoiler)
"BB" <None@[  2008-03-20 23:15:35 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Gumby <gumby@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-20 23:27:18 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
s0183616 <s0183616@[EM  2008-03-21 02:48:46 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
David B <bothecat3@[EM  2008-03-22 03:37:16 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Dano" <jane  2008-03-22 11:37:29 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
thinbluemime <thinblue  2008-03-22 16:19:39 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Magic Negro <magicnegr  2008-03-22 15:45:31 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
northernsurferboy <nor  2008-03-20 20:26:29 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Steven L." <  2008-03-21 01:34:38 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"yngver@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-20 21:31:23 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"copeab@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-21 00:04:35 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Grüe" <a@[E  2008-03-21 07:25:02 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Dano" <jane  2008-03-21 11:26:00 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"copeab@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-21 09:50:40 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Dano" <jane  2008-03-21 14:08:23 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Garondo Marondo <Class  2008-03-22 09:22:04 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Dano" <jane  2008-03-22 13:14:40 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
cloud dreamer <Global_  2008-03-22 16:50:05 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Moyra J. Bligh <moyra@  2008-03-23 13:23:19 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Garondo Marondo <Class  2008-03-22 09:22:28 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
The Translucent Amoebae &  2008-03-22 13:07:21 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Garondo Marondo <Class  2008-03-22 18:50:28 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Magic Negro <magicnegr  2008-03-22 21:06:39 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Dano" <jane  2008-03-22 23:17:24 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
David B <bothecat3@[EM  2008-03-22 19:02:25 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
David B <bothecat3@[EM  2008-03-22 19:03:37 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Dano" <jane  2008-03-22 23:16:42 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Dano" <jane  2008-03-22 23:25:01 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
David B <bothecat3@[EM  2008-03-22 19:06:09 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Garondo Marondo <Class  2008-03-22 20:26:04 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
Garondo Marondo <Class  2008-03-22 20:25:41 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-03-24 19:33:28 
Re: "Lost" on no!!1! (Spoiler)
"Dano" <jane  2008-03-24 16:52:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 12:53:14 CST 2008.