On Apr 1, 9:02=A0am, letsmakethewaterturnbl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>http://hawaiifilmoffice.blogspot.com/2006/01/lost-series-finale-will-...
>
> That article was written in January 2006, almost a year and a half
> before a deal was made to set a definite end date for the series.
--- It's not when it was written, it's what it actually says that's
relevant.
> http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117964371.html?categoryid=3D14&cs=3D1
>
> "In considering the powerful storytelling of 'Lost,' we felt this was
> the only way to give it a proper creative conclusion," ...."And, due
> to the unique nature of the series, we knew it would require an end
> date to keep the integrity and strength of the show consistent
> throughout, and to give the audience the payoff they deserve.
--- That's a lot of bull and they know it. You think they're actually
going to tell you that another few years of Lost is just a sham, that
it's only about lining their own and the network's pockets and not
about the premise of the show itself? At least they were honest about
the limitations of the show halfway through the first season when any
idea of going 6 years was an absurd notion back then. But dealmaking
and money corrupts big time.
|
