Re: Abrams Talks About Trek XI Movie

In article <Xns9A89E88B25814epwiseyahoocom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Wiseguy <epwise@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:ANIM8Rfsk-F442D8.06273123042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> 
> > In article <Xns9A88F12C13FE8epwiseyahoocom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  Wiseguy <epwise@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > 
> >> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:ANIM8Rfsk-
> >> 94EAB3.21202822042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> 
> >> > In article <Xns9A8886A4DE21epwiseyahoocom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> >  Wiseguy <epwise@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> 
> >> >> But Roddenberry re-wrote it which caused the Ellison-Rodenberry
> >> >> feud which continues to this day even with Roddenberry dead.
> >> >> 
> >> >>  
> >> > 
> >> > Roddenberry didn't rewrite City.  DC Fontana did.
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Even if he didn't do it himself, it was his decision.
> > 
> > Sure.  And he was right.
> > 
> 
> Yes, he was.  Try telling Harlan Ellison that.

I don't want my pelvis busted by a Seaview model!

-- 
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg