Ron wrote:
> On May 7, 2:28 am, "alooo" <u...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>"Moo" <rodneyl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>
>>
>>>alooo wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Tim" <jmeth...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>
>>>>>I'm new to this newsgroup and so I have a question.
>>>>>Anyone have any idea why the casket is so small? Is that just a
>>>>>production error, am I imagining things or is there a midget in it?
>>
>>>>When you're new to a group and asking about an event that happened a
year
>>>>ago, try Google's search engine for newsgroups. Search this group for
>>>>"casket" and you'll find at least a dozen very lengthy discussions on
the
>>>>topic.
>>>
>>>Well the producers did say we'd know the identity of the person inside
the
>>>casket by the end of this season.... so it's kinda relevant...
>>
>>I didn't say it wasn't relevant. But since this topic has been revisted
>>numerous times in this newsgroup (despite no new information from the
show),
>>the original poster could find the answers he's looking for in previous
>>threads. And since nobody so far has provided those answers in this
thread,
>>I think the Google search is a good option.
>
>
> No doubt reading the old posts is a good idea, but this is THE WORST
> group I've ever seen about not repeating posts....even to the point of
> people apologizing "in case this has been discussed before". It's
> ridiculous!
>
> There is NOTHING wrong with someone asking a question no matter how
> many times it's been discussed before, period.
>
> And to answer the OP's question, IMO it was a full size casket and the
> camera lens made it look smaller.
>
The camera angle was head on at least at one point. Wow, talk about a
tricky angle.
|
