Tim wrote:
> Ron wrote:
>
>> On May 7, 2:28 am, "alooo" <u...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> "Moo" <rodneyl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>
>>>
>>>> alooo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Tim" <jmeth...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm new to this newsgroup and so I have a question.
>>>>>> Anyone have any idea why the casket is so small? Is that just a
>>>>>> production error, am I imagining things or is there a midget in it?
>>>
>>>
>>>>> When you're new to a group and asking about an event that happened
>>>>> a year
>>>>> ago, try Google's search engine for newsgroups. Search this group
for
>>>>> "casket" and you'll find at least a dozen very lengthy discussions
>>>>> on the
>>>>> topic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well the producers did say we'd know the identity of the person
>>>> inside the
>>>> casket by the end of this season.... so it's kinda relevant...
>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't say it wasn't relevant. But since this topic has been
revisted
>>> numerous times in this newsgroup (despite no new information from the
>>> show),
>>> the original poster could find the answers he's looking for in
previous
>>> threads. And since nobody so far has provided those answers in this
>>> thread,
>>> I think the Google search is a good option.
>>
>>
>>
>> No doubt reading the old posts is a good idea, but this is THE WORST
>> group I've ever seen about not repeating posts....even to the point of
>> people apologizing "in case this has been discussed before". It's
>> ridiculous!
>>
>> There is NOTHING wrong with someone asking a question no matter how
>> many times it's been discussed before, period.
>>
>> And to answer the OP's question, IMO it was a full size casket and the
>> camera lens made it look smaller.
>>
> The camera angle was head on at least at one point. Wow, talk about a
> tricky angle.
http://bp3.blogger.com/_RrObyQ3XzcY/RlUuLlYihVI/AAAAAAAAFlI/dpKzQxlHvFQ/s1600-h/Image8.jpg
|
