by thinbluemime <thinbluemime@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 8, 2008 at 12:48 PM
On Thu, 08 May 2008 12:09:39 -0400, Darren Delgado
<darrendelgado@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> This is probably relevant to the "Are the Numbers im****tant?" 9,000
> post argument. I found this on DarkUFO's site which usually doesn't
> put anything in the spoiler section unless it's substantiated.
>
> http://spoilerslost.blogspot.com/2008/05/numbers-are-back.html
> "...Carlton and Damon were on 106.7 KROQ's morning show this morning
> and one of the radio hosts asked about the numbers. Either Carlton or
> Damon responded that the numbers will be back in the season finale."
>
> I doubt they'd waste time in the finale with more legend-building
> stuff about the Numbers. I would guess something delving into the
> origin and the meaning.
tweedle deedle dumpling, my son jon,
with one shoe off and one shoe on
Are tauds on craphole island?
Locke's upcomimg flashback gets us to his 1960's teenage years.
Locke's immaculate conception would be very close to the 'date' of the
looking glassed Hurley Numbers.
(despite the math of lostpedia)
8491 ,4 hcraM
--
http://www.lostdude.com
