On May 9, 2:14=EF=BF=BDam, Jim Gysin <jimgy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 00:04:48 -0700 (PDT), rwgibson13
>
> <rwgibso...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 9, 1:16?am, Jim Gysin <jimgy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Based on Emily's figure as she danced at the beginning of the
episode,=
> > > I'm guessing that Locke's birth weight was somewhere in the
neighborho=
od
> > > of 8 oz. ?That hospital must have had one heck of a neonatal unit.
>
> > heh, I don't think the kid needed a lot of help :-)
>
> > RWG (immaculate conception and all that...)
>
> I wasn't here when the episode you're alluding to originally aired, so
> I'm wondering what the general consensus was at that time. =EF=BF=BDDid
mo=
st
> folks here think that Emily was simply off her meds, or did most
> believe that she was correct when she said that?
Considering "Walkabout," I think we were supposed to be torn between
the science/faith thing. It was pretty much the same kind of
tightrope the producers have been walking since the pilot episode.
On the one hand, we know John Locke has some kind of bizarre "special"
ability that allowed him to walk when he was once crippled. On the
other hand, you don't normally get a kidney match with someone you're
not related to.
RWG (like most things with this show, each has its own appeal to
certain members of the viewing audience)
|
