by "L. Paragon" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 9, 2008 at 10:31 AM
<ejt789_99@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:8962040d-e607-44b4-8766-7e5f1c1d12f4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My apologies and congratulations to the "Richard isn't aging" folks.
> You were right all along. Good call.
Don't be hasty. He may actually be aging biologically but we just haven't
seen it yet because he is existing outside of sequence with the normal
flow
of (show) time.
Yeah, that's the ticket.
lp
