Re: how we know Locke's past is phony

On May 9, 1:47=A0pm, robg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> Our clue is that Richard Alpert appears to be the same age in all the
> flashbacks. =A0So he's our timer, our "constant". =A0It means the scenes
> took place fairly recently, which means they were acting out a phony
> past for Locke using different actors.

Right, because it's im****tant for the baby playing preemie Locke to
think it was visited by Alpert, so that adult Locke would remember it?

In the words of Christian Shephard, it's over.  Let it go.