On Fri, 09 May 2008 14:41:28 -0500, emptybowl <fake@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> robgood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in news:4fb6aff1-8870-429c-9629-550a9fc4abb7
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Our clue is that Richard Alpert appears to be the same age in all the
> > flashbacks. So he's our timer, our "constant". It means the scenes
> > took place fairly recently, which means they were acting out a phony
> > past for Locke using different actors.
>
> I have to give you credit, robgood. You continually fail to stray from
your
> asinine theory, despite the mountain of evidence building against it.
> Instead you just choose to shoehorn everything into your explanation. If
> this is truly what you believe, it flabbergasts me that you find the
show
> even remotely watchable.
>
> And I'd like to give myself a pat on the back, because last night while
> watching, seeing Alpert arrive at lock's birth, all I could think was "I
> can't wait to see robgood's explanation for this. I bet he argues
they're
> acting it out...."
>
> Seriously, stp back a second and think about how any of what you just
said
> makes a lick of sense. For who's benefit it this? Why dress up people in
> period costumes and have them act out something no one sees that
supposedly
> took place 50 years ago? Why dress an entire streetwith 1950s cars so
that
> one of the actors can be hit, and why fake an entire 1950s hospital? I
> mean, sweriously, why bother? Anyone NOT involved in the ruse wouldn't
be
> convinced of it in the least, since they'd say "Hey, wait a minute. It's
> not 1957..." This is RETARDED. (Not as retarded as "baby in a backpack"
but
> close.)
I'm convinced that it's just a shtick on his part. Because the
alternative... well, the alternative doesn't bode well for robgood's
ability to function on a daily basis in the real world.
> And before you start explaining, quit it with the "Well the Lost
producers
> did it to film the show" bull**** argument. You know that's ****, so
quit
> it.
>
> > Another possible clue is the disagreement between the ear, which said
> > the music on the record was Buddy Holly's version of "Every Day", and
> > the closed caption, which said it was Don Mclean's. That could also
> > be Damon's shout-out to the feud between Mclean and Andy Breckman.
>
> Closed Captioning is wrong all the time, even on shows that aren't as
> conspiracy laden as Lost, so I would put no stock in that error
whatsoever.
The captioners are in on the conspiracy! Is there no end to this web
of deceit and treachery?
--
Jim Gysin
Waukesha, WI
|
