Re: how we know Locke's past is phony

Jim Gysin <jimgysin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:8jd9245uersd139fdju7nb33ru707thnou@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> I'm convinced that it's just a shtick on his part.  Because the
> alternative... well, the alternative doesn't bode well for robgood's
> ability to function on a daily basis in the real world.

I thought it was schtick, too, until I saw his picture: 
http://users.bestweb.net/~robgood/fire/santa.jpg

If anyone were to be as stubborn about a ridiculous conspiracy theory like

robgood's it would be a guy that looks like that.

> The captioners are in on the conspiracy!  Is there no end to this web
> of deceit and treachery?

No, don't you see? The difference in captioning was actually a special 
"wink and a nod" to robgood specifically from Damon! Did you know that 
robgood claims to know Damon? He certainly doesn't mention it very much!
 
</sarcasm>