Re: how we know Locke's past is phony

On Fri, 09 May 2008 15:46:26 -0500, emptybowl <fake@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Jim Gysin <jimgysin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:8jd9245uersd139fdju7nb33ru707thnou@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> 
> > I'm convinced that it's just a shtick on his part.  Because the
> > alternative... well, the alternative doesn't bode well for robgood's
> > ability to function on a daily basis in the real world.
> 
> I thought it was schtick, too, until I saw his picture: 
> http://users.bestweb.net/~robgood/fire/santa.jpg
> 
> If anyone were to be as stubborn about a ridiculous conspiracy theory
like 
> robgood's it would be a guy that looks like that.

He would presumably have to be drooling into a bib 24/7 and have a
full-time Faraday-like caretaker to believe even half of what he posts
here.  I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and stay with shtick,
and I'll refrain from making any comments about the photo, too.  It's
not as if I'm gonna be winning any modeling contests myself.  (And no,
I don't need a bib, either.)

> > The captioners are in on the conspiracy!  Is there no end to this web
> > of deceit and treachery?
> 
> No, don't you see? The difference in captioning was actually a special 
> "wink and a nod" to robgood specifically from Damon! Did you know that 
> robgood claims to know Damon? He certainly doesn't mention it very much!

I may have read something about that once or twice...

--
Jim Gysin
Waukesha, WI