On May 9, 4:38 pm, robg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 9, 12:07 pm, "yng...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <yng...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On May 9, 10:43 am, Davej <galt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Ben talked to Jacob directly but Locke gets a substitute ghost?
> > > Because Jacob is busy elsewhere? Because Jacob is ill? Because Jacob
> > > is just a previous spokesperson ghost?
> > I'm guessing Jacob is a ghost too. But yeah, how come Ben spent years
> > talking to Jacob and now Locke gets a smug stand-in?
>
> That was rather cheesy, wasn't it? "I can speak on his behalf."
> Yeah, sure, buddy, I didn't uncover the clues and come all this way to
> talk to the lieutenant. I'm not leaving until you get grandma out of
> the closet and in my face.
>
> Robert
Besides, why should Locke believe Christian anyway when he says that
he can speak for Jacob? I mean, aside from the fact that Locke is
gullible.
-yngver
|
