"emptybowl" <fake@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns9A999F9EDC015octopaganinigmailcom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> robgood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in news:4fb6aff1-8870-429c-9629-550a9fc4abb7
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Our clue is that Richard Alpert appears to be the same age in all the
>> flashbacks. So he's our timer, our "constant". It means the scenes
>> took place fairly recently, which means they were acting out a phony
>> past for Locke using different actors.
>
> I have to give you credit, robgood. You continually fail to stray from
> your
> asinine theory, despite the mountain of evidence building against it.
> Instead you just choose to shoehorn everything into your explanation. If
> this is truly what you believe, it flabbergasts me that you find the
show
> even remotely watchable.
>
> And I'd like to give myself a pat on the back, because last night while
> watching, seeing Alpert arrive at lock's birth, all I could think was "I
> can't wait to see robgood's explanation for this. I bet he argues
they're
> acting it out...."
>
> Seriously, stp back a second and think about how any of what you just
said
> makes a lick of sense. For who's benefit it this? Why dress up people in
> period costumes and have them act out something no one sees that
> supposedly
> took place 50 years ago? Why dress an entire streetwith 1950s cars so
that
> one of the actors can be hit, and why fake an entire 1950s hospital? I
> mean, sweriously, why bother? Anyone NOT involved in the ruse wouldn't
be
> convinced of it in the least, since they'd say "Hey, wait a minute. It's
> not 1957..." This is RETARDED. (Not as retarded as "baby in a backpack"
> but
> close.)
I worry that this could be a mild instance of paranoid personality
disorder.
The condition can render a person extremely suspicious of those around
them.
In extreme cases, some subjects may become convinced that their loved ones
have been replaced by impostors. Fortunately though, this instance seems
to
be very mild, manifesting itself as nothing more than a strange but
ultimately harmless distrust of a television show.
|
