Re: Keamy unswayed by Smokey?

On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:45:41 -0700 (PDT), tdciago <tdciago@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

> On May 12, 2:18?pm, Jim Gysin <jimgy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > ?Or maybe the nanobots need
> > more processing power. ?(I'm still putting my money on Smoky being a
> > nanocritter of some sort.)
> 
> Nanotechnology has been ruled out:
> __________________________________
> Is there a scientific explanation for the smoke monster?
> CC: We can't answer that question without answering the question of
> what is the smoke monster or without giving too much away. So we have
> to pass on that one.
> DL: We have ruled out that the smoke monster has a basis in
> nanotechnology, though, which is the most popular scientific
> explanation for the smoke monster.

Rats.  Back to the drawing board, I guess.

--
Jim Gysin
Waukesha, WI