Re: Immaculate conception

Darren Delgado wrote:

> On May 14, 8:23 am, number6 <snumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>On May 14, 8:16 am, Darren Delgado <darrendelg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:>
On May 13, 11:24 am, number6 <snumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>On May 13, 11:22 am, Gumby <gu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Y'know, I'm not religious but the lot of you folks in this thread are
>>>>>  being disrespectful to those who are.
>>
>>>>and ... I bet they self-righteously call themselves "tolerant" ...
>>
>>>I can't speak for anyone else in the thread, but I don't consider
>>>myself "tolerant" of religion.  Religious people are rarely tolerant
>>>of non-religious people so why not return the favor.
>>
>> I gotcha ... you're a bigot ... thanks for the clarification ...
> 
> 
> I don't harass religious people and I don't propose denying them their
> right to believe their goofy fairy stories.  That would be bigotry.
> 
> I only oppose religion to the extent that it impacts my life and the
> lives of other people who don't agree with the goofy fairy stories.

"Goofy fairy stories." You don;t see how that is overtly 
disrespectful?  You can agree to disagree without resorting to 
complete disrespect of others' beliefs.

Your need to insult speaks volumes.


> And the victims of religious bigotry.  Of course I said that in the
> post the first time, but you snipped it off 'cause you wanted to make
> a snappy one-liner.