On Fri, 16 May 2008 05:32:17 -0700 (PDT), tdciago <tdciago@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On May 16, 7:24?am, Tim <jmeth...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Plus, she sure got into shape quickly after the pregnancy.
> > She should go on Oprah.
>
> They really walked a tightrope in the numbers for the pregnancy story.
>
> 1) They had to make Kate *early* enough along (6 months) at the time
> of the crash so that her pregnancy might not show. It's still a
> ridiculous concept that a woman with Kate's build would've shown zero
> signs of being pregnant, IMO.
This is the second time in as many weeks that they've done that, though.
Locke's mom was also supposed to be almost six months along, and she had
the figure of a typical, young un-pregnant girl.
Maybe Darlton need a medical consultant for the show...
--
Jim Gysin
Waukesha, WI
|
