On May 16, 1:21=EF=BF=BDpm, Jim Gysin <jimgy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 05:32:17 -0700 (PDT), tdciago <tdci...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> > On May 16, 7:24?am, Tim <jmeth...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Plus, she sure got into shape quickly after the pregnancy.
> > > She should go on Oprah.
>
> > They really walked a tightrope in the numbers for the pregnancy story.
>
> > 1) They had to make Kate *early* enough along (6 months) at the time
> > of the crash so that her pregnancy might not show. It's still a
> > ridiculous concept that a woman with Kate's build would've shown zero
> > signs of being pregnant, IMO.
>
> This is the second time in as many weeks that they've done that, though.
> Locke's mom was also supposed to be almost six months along, and she had
> the figure of a typical, young un-pregnant girl.
>
> Maybe Darlton need a medical consultant for the show...
As goofy as it sounds to us guys, there are do***ented cases of women
giving birth when they actually had NO idea they were even pregnant...
RWG (it's incredibly rare, but evidently it does happen)
|
