Re: Who is more dangerous Martha or Bush?

"Katra" <KatraMungBean@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:KatraMungBean-F16422.16454026102004@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <2u7r5jF277pfqU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  "Jack H." <NoR@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > "bluskie" <wildbluskies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:a9dd1b95.0410261029.3d419a20@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Martha tells a little white lie and goes to prison. Bush tells an
> > > elaborate lie, a fraud, a hoax that results in the pain, suffering,
> > > and murder of thousands of innocent people, yet remains free. Who is
> > > more dangerous? Perhaps both are the symptoms of a dangerous
disease?
> >
> > I couldn't give a flying **** at a rolling donut.
> >
> > I will be so freaking happy when this election CRAP is all over with.
I
> > don't even really care who wins. It is all just Politics, it is
nothing
> > serious.
> >
> >
> > Howm Grone J
> >
> >
>
> You won't be saying that if ****tard Bush wins again.. :-(
> Kerry is no prize, but IMHO he is the lesser of two evils.

That is what I said about Bush 4 years ago.
Just now on the way home from taking the mrs to work, I was wondering what
Bore would have done to **** things up.

Maybe the new Dodge Magnum and Hemi (although why they call it a hemi is
beyond me since it seems to have a wedge shaped head and not an
hemispherical one) would have never been produced.
So I guess a war with the towel heads ain't so bad after all.
Where is the free oil from the plunder and booty??


>
> K.

Howm Grone J