Re: Who is more dangerous Martha or Bush?

"CoLoNeL pOlYpS" <voodoo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<clms7a010ej@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> "Roedy Green" <look-on@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:pc6tn0h7et4fqg3td2fdu8jjhsj7d042f3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On 26 Oct 2004 11:29:11 -0700, wildbluskies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (bluskie)
> > wrote or quoted :
> >
> > >Martha tells a little white lie and goes to prison. Bush tells an
> > >elaborate lie, a fraud, a hoax that results in the pain, suffering,
> > >and murder of thousands of innocent people, yet remains free. Who is
> > >more dangerous? Perhaps both are the symptoms of a dangerous disease?
> >
> > And Bush cried worlf about nuclear war. Surely that should be a
> > capital offense if anything is.
> >
> > Also framing an entire country for 3000 murders ought to be a capital
> > offense too.
> >
> > Bush is clearly guilty of many war crimes.  He may yet stand trial.
> > I normally don't sup****t the death penalty, but what Bush has done is
> > so far beyond what any serial murderer has ever accomplished, some
> > special exception has to be made for him.
> >
> 
> I'm still trying to get this goddamned microchip out of my back that
George Bush and the
> secret service stuck there in 1982 when they kidnapped, drugged and
interogated me. Before
> they put me in the Isle Morada jail and called me crazy.
> 
> I'm just a poor white boy who ain't nobody. My Grandpa Bomb did some
nice artwork October,
> 1781 Yorktown.

You sound like ex cia, they got to you big time, can you remember
anything else about what happened before circa 1982? can you recall
any personal military or subversive actions on your part?