Re: Fahrenheit 9-11 was Re: Mazes and Monsters

Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

>Roger and Me starts with 'before and after' the plant closed footage, 
>showing how life was great before and horrible after.  But the before 
>and after footage isn't from the correct dates; Moore just took the 
>'bad' footage and put it in the 'after' section and the 'good' footage 
>and put it in the before section.  

  I haven't seen the movie in years but I am at a loss to figure out 
what you mean by the vague qualifiers "good footage" and "bad footage".

>I instantly spotted (hey! A TV reference!  We're back on topic!) 

  You know this is being posted to 3 ng's, right?  Well, two now, I 
trimmed the headers.

>a shot of Guy Williams in a 
>Thanksgiving parade as Zorro (being a big Zorro fan) and knew it 
>couldn't be from the date claimed, 'cause I knew exactly when Zorro 
>premiered.  I didn't know a thing about Moore or the topic or anything 
>going into Roger and Me, but I spotted a fraud a couple minutes in.

  So you're saying the year of the parade footage was listed as 
incorrect, right?  Because the parade was definitely shown as being a 
Thanksgiving parade and, as such, has a very narrow window of a couple 
of days of when it could occur.  The year could differ, but not the 
month nor the dates.
  What I am curious about is why the year of the Thanksgiving parade 
matters.  What year did Moore claim it was, and what year was it really?
  Finally, please elaborate on why the date of the Thanksgiving parade 
affects the message of the movie.
  Thanks.

Stacia