Re: [OT] Fahrenheit 9-11 was Re: Mazes and Monsters

Stacia wrote:
> No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> 
> 
>>Using someone's image for commercial purposes without their consent is 
>>generally illegal. One exception is for the news, which might (or might 
>>now) apply if F911 had been a do***entary. Since it wasn't, that
wouldn't 
>>apply.

Uh-huh.  The only ones that seem to think that are you and Ubi, two 
tail-wagging idiots that couldn't be trusted with a burnt-out match.

>>There's also the matter of deliberately (and it couldn't have been 
>>otherwise) misprepresenting their views, and various slander, libel and 
>>defamation laws.

Nonsense.  All of the Fox commentators would be in court their whole 
lives if deliberate misrepresentation were an actionable offense.  Not 
to mention most of the current government.

As for SLD, who's alleging that, besides you?

>   Yeah, that's why everyone defamed and slandered has been suing the 
> pants off Moore, instead of just whining about it online.  Oh, wait, 
> that's right... there ARE no lawsuits.  Never were.  That's odd, don't 
> you think?
> 
> Stacia
> 

Well, that's not true.  There is a lawsuit, but it's not about illegal 
use of image.  It's about someone whining that they were even included 
in a film to begin with.  If he hadn't wanted to be in the film, he 
didn't have to talk to Moore when the cameras were rolling, did he?