Re: Fahrenheit 9-11 was Re: Mazes and Monsters

Anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <1158010987.001449.289550@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  "John" <jsphillips1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>
>>>Stacia wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>  Finally, I don't understand why the rightwing nutjobs,
conservatives,
>>>>and pro-war fanatics are all still so upset about the movie.
>>>
>>>You misspelled 'people smarter than you'
>>>
>>> It didn't
>>>
>>>>exactly affect the election, now did it?  Your boy is still in office.
>>>>What's the damage?
>>>
>>>"Roger and Me" was a fraud job too.  I didn't like that one any better.
>>>The damage is people with tiny intellects that buy into Moore's lies.
>>
>>Having not seen Fahrenheit 9-11 or Roger and Me, I would love to hear
>>an example of one of these lies.
>>
>>
>>John
> 
> 
> Roger and Me starts with 'before and after' the plant closed footage, 
> showing how life was great before and horrible after.  But the before 
> and after footage isn't from the correct dates; Moore just took the 
> 'bad' footage and put it in the 'after' section and the 'good' footage 
> and put it in the before section.

Do you have proof of this?

>I instantly spotted (hey! A TV 
> reference!  We're back on topic!) a shot of Guy Williams in a 
> Thanksgiving parade as Zorro (being a big Zorro fan) and knew it 
> couldn't be from the date claimed, 'cause I knew exactly when Zorro 
> premiered.  I didn't know a thing about Moore or the topic or anything 
> going into Roger and Me, but I spotted a fraud a couple minutes in.

What date was that?