Ubiquitous wrote:
> noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>
>>>capt_malachias@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Ubiquitous" <weberm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>HWayne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>I never quite understood this. Who in their right minds would
get
>>>>>>>>>>their views on life from a *movie*?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ask those who watched "Fahrenheit 9-11"...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Or "Red Dawn."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Umm, yeah, Try again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So you agree then? Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>Umm, do try and catch up with the rest of us on the right-hand side
of
>>>>>the bell-curve, mmkay?
>>>>
>>>>You mean the right hand side of the wingnut basket, right?
>>>
>>>No, just those who think "Red Dawn" is an intelligent retort to my
>>>brilliant observation.
>>
>>You still haven't said why you think F911 is fiction, lamer.
>
>
> Actually, I did.
No, you didn't.
>Don't blame me for your reading comprehension problems
> and your selective memory.
>
And where is the message ID of this alleged post of yours, fabricator?
In message ID 8pCdndF8_LEYIpnYnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you said:
Wrong. "Fahrenheit 9-11" was a fictional movie, not a do***entary.
|
