Re: [OT] Fahrenheit 9-11 was Re: Mazes and Monsters

Some Guy <noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:5xpNg.2882$nL2.2218@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> Malachias Invictus wrote:
>> "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:Xns983B65569C3B4taustingmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>>>"Malachias Invictus" <capt_malachias@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>news:vOKdnTCHStalFZjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Green Clogs" <GC45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:TcfNg.17066$o42.12598@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>>Malachias Invictus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Green Clogs" <GC45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:9fcNg.19368$dl.7038@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Malachias Invictus wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Ubiquitous" <weberm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:mfadnSE3i4PdR5nYnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>That does not negate the fact that "Fahrenheit 9-11" was a
>>>>>>>>>fictional movie,
>>>>>>>>>not a do***entary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Upon what evidence are you basing that claim?  Be specific.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Upon what eviodence do you base the claim that the sun is hot?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nice dodge.  Let me know when you grow the balls to actually
>>>>>>answer the question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>That was the answer.
>>>>
>>>>No, it wasn't.  It was a question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>If you're too dim to understand it,
>>>>
>>>>I understand exactly what you are doing, coward.  It is a common
>>>>rhetorical trick.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>that's your problem.
>>>>
>>>>Let me know when you grow the balls to actually answer the question.
>>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1164856/posts
gives specific
>>>lies by Moore, and cites sources.
> 
>  From the cite Terry quotes:
> 
> "Moore’s editing technique of the election night segment is typical of
> his style: all the video clips are real clips, and nothing he says is,
> formally speaking, false."
> 
> "If you listen only to what Moore says during this segment of the 
> movie—and take careful notes in the dark—you’ll find he’s got his
> facts right."
> 
> So much for the allegations of *lies,* which is where the real beef
> is. 
>   A lie is something that you know isn't true like, say, declaring
>   that 
> Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.

So you're trying to be *just* like fat-ass Moore, eh? You've address two 
out of fifty six "deceits" on the page in question, and pretend - and 
will actively lie about, because you literally cannot stop lying - that 
is the entire page.

And lying by implication is still lying, no matter how ****ing stupid you 
are, Burke.

You may now continue sucking my dick, Burke. You *know* that's all you 
really want. That's all you *ever* really want.

-- 
"So there is no third law of Terrydynamics."
              -- William Hyde
Terry Austin