Ubiquitous wrote:
> noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>
>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>David Johnston wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:29:17 -0500, weberm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Ubiquitous)
>>>>>>>wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>>>I never quite understood this. Who in their right minds would get
>>>>>>>>>their views on life from a *movie*?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Ask those who watched "Fahrenheit 9-11"...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why? Nobody changed their minds as a result of that movie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But it was fun watching the Bu****es crap their pants over it.
>>>>>
>>>>>You appear to be getting confused with the reaction of the Clinton
>>>>>Myrmidons to "The Path to 9-11".
>>>>
>>>>It might appear that way to you, but that's because you're stupid.
>>>
>>>In other words, I won. Again.
>>
>>It might appear that way to you, but that's because you're stupid.
>
>
> Ahh, yes, an ad hominum, the clearest sign of someone who has lost the
debate.
> QED.
Speaking of losing the debate, now that you've had a whole day to think
about it, did you ever find any sup****t for your contention that F911 is
fiction? I mean, aside from your own idiocy?
|
