Re: Mazes and Monsters

"D.T.Collins" <dirk.collins@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:R73Og.10126$xC3.3853@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> 
> No. 33 Secretary wrote:
>> Sea Wasp wrote:
>>> Kaos wrote:
>>>> Invid Fan wrote:
>>>>> Bill Wayne wrote:
>>>>>No different then getting it from a book. Suppose Ayn Rand had
>>>>>skipped the book and done The Fountainhead as a movie. Would the
>>>>>ideas in it have less meaning?
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible for it to have less meaning in the first place?
>>>> (Outside of an objectivist "our groupthink isn't groupthink at all"
>>>> camp, that is...)
>>>
>>>      Your above comment shows you have either not read, or have not
>>> understood, Rand's philosophy. It is easily possible to show that
>>> her philosophy has FLAWS -- basically the same flaws pure Communism
>>> has, in a dark mirror -- but dismissing it so casually indicates a
>>> failure to grasp it at all.
>>>
>> "I still believe that Rand was a great philosopher. But I am ****fting
>> toward the position that her greatness is as an unhappy example of
>> inadvertent folly."
>>
>> http://home.ca.inter.net/~grantsky/re-evaluating.html
>>
>> The most common description I see of Rand (other than from people who
>> sound
>> like over-excited puppies, that is) is "cult leader." Not someone
>> whose opinions I really care about.
> 
> O.K. then, what philosopher rules? 

Hank Williams, Sr.

-- 
"So there is no third law of Terrydynamics."
              -- William Hyde
Terry Austin