noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>Ubiquitous wrote:
>> noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>David Johnston wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:29:17 -0500, weberm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Ubiquitous)
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>I never quite understood this. Who in their right minds would
get
>>>>>>>>>>their views on life from a *movie*?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ask those who watched "Fahrenheit 9-11"...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why? Nobody changed their minds as a result of that movie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But it was fun watching the Bu****es crap their pants over it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You appear to be getting confused with the reaction of the Clinton
>>>>>>Myrmidons to "The Path to 9-11".
>>>>>
>>>>>It might appear that way to you, but that's because you're stupid.
>>>>
>>>>In other words, I won. Again.
>>>
>>>It might appear that way to you, but that's because you're stupid.
>>
>>
>> Ahh, yes, an ad hominum, the clearest sign of someone who has lost the
>> debate. QED.
>
>Speaking of losing the debate, now that you've had a whole day to think
>about it, did you ever find any sup****t for your contention that F911 is
>fiction? I mean, aside from your own idiocy?
Thanks for verifying my point. You can't debate the facts that have been
posted so all you can do is use weak ad hominums in a desperate attempt
to change the subject. I own you.
--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.
|
