Re: [OT] Fahrenheit 9-11 was Re: Mazes and Monsters

Rob Jensen <ShutUpRob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:6mrlg2ttj9a64j24alkmm6nkdlkmnlqetm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:06:27 -0000, No 33 Secretary
> <terry.notaniceperson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>stacia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Stacia) wrote in
>>news:ee4gqi$rkb$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>
>>> No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>> 
>>>>Using someone's image for commercial purposes without their consent
>>>>is generally illegal. One exception is for the news, which might (or
>>>>might now) apply if F911 had been a do***entary. Since it wasn't,
>>>>that wouldn't apply.
>>> 
>>>>There's also the matter of deliberately (and it couldn't have been 
>>>>otherwise) misprepresenting their views, and various slander, libel
>>>>and defamation laws.
>>> 
>>>   Yeah, that's why everyone defamed and slandered has been suing the
>>> pants off Moore, instead of just whining about it online.  Oh, wait,
>>> that's right... there ARE no lawsuits.  Never were.  That's odd,
>>> don't you think?
>>> 
>>Not at all. A lawsuit costs at least $100,000 to pursue to a jury 
>>decision, and several times that if there is an appeal. Moore has the 
>>money to defend himself. Most of his victims (on that issue, anyway)
>>seem to have been military personnel, who a) don't make a lot of
>>money, and b) usually aren't in one place all that long at a time, and
>>would thus have to travel frequently to appear in court.
>>
>>Are you really so ****ing retarded as to not understand that?
> 
> As if there aren't a gazillion conservative-leaning lawyers who
> wouldn't take such a case on a pro-bono or pay-upon-win-only basis.

Name some. Confirm that would take a case of this nature. Or not. 
"Everybody knows" isn't proof, it's a sign of supidity on your part.

(Even without legal fees, lawsuits are expensive. Are you so ****ing 
stupid you know know that?)

> The fact that no legitimate high profile ambulance chasers have taken
> on the complaints of these "buyers' remorse" interviewees' cases just
> indicates all the more how little ground they have to stand on and
> just how strong Moore's case is.  

You *are* a retard.

> BTW, Moore had every allegation that
> he made in F911 vetted by a *team* of lawyers.

And your poof is? Be specific. A scan of the do***entation, or a direct 
quote from Moore or one of the lawyers will do.

(And if lawyers were always right, there'd be no lawsuits at all. Only a 
****ing retard could possibly not realize that.)

>  The facts stand up and
> the opinions stand up.  

You really are a retard.

>That's why every lawsuit against him on that
> movie has been laughed out of court.

Give specifics. Or not. We both know you're making **** up.
> 
> Are you really so ****ing retarded as to not understand that?

I know you are, but what am I?

-- 
"So there is no third law of Terrydynamics."
              -- William Hyde
Terry Austin