Re: Fahrenheit 9-11 was Re: Mazes and Monsters

Ubiquitous wrote:
> noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> 
>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>
>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>jsphillips1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Stacia wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>>>>>Finally, I don't understand why the rightwing nutjobs,
conservatives,
>>>>>>>>and pro-war fanatics are all still so upset about the movie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You misspelled 'people smarter than you'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It didn't
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>exactly affect the election, now did it?  Your boy is still in
office.
>>>>>>>>What's the damage?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Roger and Me" was a fraud job too.  I didn't like that one any
better.
>>>>>>>The damage is people with tiny intellects that buy into Moore's
lies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Having not seen Fahrenheit 9-11 or Roger and Me, I would love to
hear
>>>>>>an example of one of these lies.
>>>>>
>>>>>You mean besides the ones already cited (and immediately ignored)?
>>>>
>>>>You've yet to produce an actual lie, fuzzy.
>>>
>>>Thanks for making my case!
>>
>>What case--that you're stupid?  Well, it's not like it's that hard or 
>>anything.
> 
> 
> No, the case that I made.

Yes, that you're stupid.  We are on the same track (for once).  That's 
case is so made it could head a Mafia crime family.  After all, you're 
the one that posted a link to a pro-F911 Web site as "proof" that the 
movie lied.

>You really need to work on those reading
> comprehension problems of yours so you don't keep making an arse of 
> yourself in this newsfroup.
> 

Speaking of reading comprehension problems, did you ever come up with an 
actual LIE from F911?  No?  OK, I'll keep waiting.